4.5 Article

Inhibition of TRPC5 channels by intracellular ATP

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 42-49

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.040899

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R01NS035047] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35047] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TRPC5 channels are Ca2+ -permeable nonselective cation channels activated by G-protein-coupled receptors, although the mechanisms responsible for channel activation and regulation are poorly understood. Carbachol-activated TRPC5 currents were recorded by the whole-cell patch clamp technique from human embryonic kidney 293 cells transiently transfected with TRPC5 and the M1 muscarinic receptor. Some published studies of TRPC5 currents have included ATP and/or GTP in the patch pipette, whereas others used an ATP- and GTP-free pipette solution. We initially included these two nucleotides in the patch pipette but found that TRPC5 currents were absent or were very small. Recordings made with an ATP- and GTP-free pipette solution produced large and robust TRPC5 currents. Under these conditions, treatment of cells with Pasteurella multocida toxin, a selective inhibitor of G alpha(q), almost abolished TRPC5 currents indicating that G alpha(q) is necessary for activation of TRPC5 by the M1 receptor. To study the effect of intracellular ATP on TRPC5 channels, an intracellular perfusion system was used. Perfusion of ADP or control pipette solution had no effect, whereas perfusion of ATP or AMP-PNP, a nonhydrolyzable analog of ATP, significantly inhibited TRPC5 currents. Thus, the effects of ATP have structural specificity and probably involve a direct effect on the channel rather than a phosphorylation-mediated effect. The activity of TRPC5 channels may be linked to cellular metabolism via changes in ATP levels and could be involved in Ca2+ overload occurring after ischemia when ATP is depleted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据