4.5 Article

Mineralization of the deep gray matter with age: A retrospective review with susceptibility-weighted MR imaging

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 176-183

出版社

AMER SOC NEURORADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0770

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) is an advanced MR imaging sequence that can be implemented at high resolution. This sequence can be performed on conventional MR imaging scanners and is very sensitive to mineralization. The purpose of this study was to establish the course of mineralization in the deep gray matter with age by using SWI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed susceptibility-weighted images of 134 patients (age range, 1 to 88 years). Inclusion criteria comprised a normal conventional MR imaging (T1, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences). We statistically analyzed the relative signal intensities of the globus pallidus, putamen, substantia nigra, caudate nucleus, red nucleus, and thalamus for correlation with age. The putamen was graded according to a modified scale, based on previous work that described a systematic pattern of mineralization with age. Bands of hypointensity in the globus pallidus, dubbed waves, were also evaluated. RESULTS: We documented decreasing intensity lie, increasing mineralization) with age in all deep gray matter areas analyzed. We confirmed the age-related posterolateral to anteromedial progression of mineralization in the putamen. Characteristic medial and lateral bands of mineralization were exhibited in the globus pallidus in all children and young adults older than 3 years. Finally, an increase in the number of waves present in the globus pallidus was associated with increased age by category. CONCLUSION: This study documents the course and pattern of mineralization in the deep gray matter with age, as determined by SWI. These findings may play a role in evaluating diseased brains in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据