4.7 Article

Gray matter prefrontal changes in type 2 diabetes detected using MRI

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 14-19

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21224

关键词

neuroanatomy; prefrontal; gray matter changes; type 2 diabetes; MRI

资金

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [M01RR000865] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [K23MH091254] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To examine the volumes of the gray and white matter both globally and regionally in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and controls. Materials and Methods: Our samples were comprised of 26 patients with type 2 diabetes, 26 patients with diabetes and Major depressive disorder, and 25 nondiabetic, nondepressed control subjects. All subjects were studied cross-sectionally on a 1.5 T scanner and were recruited from medicine/diabetes clinics. Both gray and white matter volumes were estimated using an automated method, and the prefrontal areas studied included the anterior cingulate, the gyrus rectus, and the orbitofrontal regions. Results: Patients with diabetes, both with and without depression, had smaller total brain gray matter volumes when compared with the control subjects after controlling for age, intracranial volume, and years of education. This group also had smaller gray matter volumes in the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal regions when compared with the controls after additionally controlling for total gray matter volume. The depressed and nondepressed diabetic groups did not differ on any neuroimaging measure. Cerebrovascular risk factors correlated negatively with gray matter volumes. Conclusion: The findings indicate that type 2 diabetes is associated with specific neuroanatomical abnormalities in the prefrontal gray matter. Vascular disease might contribute to the findings observed in our sample. These observations have implications for the behavioral sequelae of diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据