4.4 Article

Beware of poor-quality MgO substrates: A study of MgO substrate quality and its effect on thin film quality

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH
卷 420, 期 -, 页码 22-31

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2015.03.010

关键词

Characterization; Crystal morphology; High resolution X-ray diffraction; Substrates; Solid phase epitaxy; Magnesium oxide

资金

  1. Linkoping University
  2. Swedish Research Council (the RAC Frame Program) [2011-6505]
  3. Linnaeus Grant (LiLi-NFM)
  4. European Research Council under the European Community Seventh Framework Program/ERC Grant [258509]
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg (KAW) Fellowship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnesium oxide (MgO) substrates are widely used for fundamental research of a large variety of materials. Our motivation is to make the research community aware of poor-quality MgO substrates. We acquired thirty MgO substrates from six different vendors and demonstrate that single-crystal' MgO substrates are not always single crystal, but can consist of multiple domains. These multiple-domain MgO substrates can have a significant impact on research results as demonstrated by a one-to-one correlation between the domain structure of MgO substrates and titanium nitride (TiN) thin films (i.e. poor-quality MgO substrates result in poor-quality TiN films). Poor-quality MgO substrates are shown to be a widespread problem with over 70% of the evaluated substrates exhibiting multiple domains, essentially disqualifying them as substrates for epitaxy. MgO substrate vendors and researchers are encouraged to work together to resolve the problem of inconsistent MgO substrate quality and the research community is encouraged to perform quality control of MgO substrates prior to thin film deposition. Quality control by vendors and/or researchers can be achieved by acquiring X-ray diffraction omega-phi maps in batch processes, as detailed in this paper. We also propose a simple quality grading system to differentiate MgO substrates of varying quality. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据