4.6 Article

LC3, an autophagosome marker, is highly expressed in gastrointestinal cancers

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 461-468

出版社

PROFESSOR D A SPANDIDOS
DOI: 10.3892/ijo_00000028

关键词

light chain 3; autophagy; cancer development; gastrointestinal cancer; esophageal cancer

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy is a bulk protein and organelle degradation process essential for cell maintenance and viability. Microtubule-associated protein I light chain 3 (LC3), the mammalian homologue of yeast Atg8, is involved in autophagosome formation during autophagy. The aim of this study was to investigate LC3 expression in gastrointestinal cancers to elucidate the role of autophagy in human cancer development. We evaluated LC3 expression by immunohistochemistry in 163 gastrointestinal cancers including 106 esophageal, 38 gastric and 19 colorectal cancers. Seventy precancerous intraepithelial neoplasias were found in esophageal cancer specimens. LC3 expression was compared with Ki-67 staining and expression of carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX, a hypoxic marker. LC3 was expressed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells, but not in noncancerous epithelial cells. A high expression of LC3 was observed in 53% of esophageal, 58% of gastric and 63% of colorectal cancers. LC3 immunoreactive score gradually increased during early esophageal carcinogenesis in low- and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and T1 carcinoma, while it did not change in later cancer progression (T2-T4 carcinomas). In early esophageal carcinogenesis, LC3 expression correlated with Ki-67 labeling index (p=0.0001), but showed no significant association with CAIX expression. In esophageal cancers, LC3 expression did not correlate with various clinicopathological factors, including survival. LC3 is upregulated in various gastrointestinal cancers and partly associated with Ki-67 index. Our results suggest that LC3 expression is advantageous to cancer development especially in early-phase carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据