4.3 Article

The effect of discontinuation of antihypertensives on the risk of acute myocardial infarction and stroke

期刊

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 121-127

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1185/030079908X253843

关键词

acute myocardial infarction; antihypertensive drug therapy; cardiovascular; database; persistence; stroke

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Adherence to antihypertensive drug treatment is suboptimal. The present study investigates the effect of early treatment discontinuation with anti hypertensive drugs on the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or stroke in daily clinical practice. Methods: In the PHARMO Record Linkage System, which includes all records of drug dispensings and hospitalisations for >= 2 million subjects in the Netherlands, new users of antihypertensive (AHT) drugs >= 18 years of age were studied during the period 1 January 1993 - 1 October 2002 to determine the risk of AMI or stroke related to persistence with AHT Patients were initially followed for 2 years to determine persistence with AHT, and then for a further 2 years or until the first hospital admission for AMI or stroke, death, or end of the study period. Patients using AHT for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease were excluded from the study cohort. Results: The study cohort included 77193 AHT users. The percentage of non-persistent patients was 55% at 2 years, with the lowest non-persistence rates for angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) and ACE-inhibitors (40%) and the highest rates for beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) and diuretics (54-61%). Non-persistent AHT use was associated with a 15% increased risk of AMI (RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.33) and a 28% increased risk of stroke (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.15-1.45). Conclusions: The results of this study show that in daily clinical practice early discontinuation of antihypertensive drug treatment in primary prevention increases the risk of subsequent AMI or stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据