4.5 Review

Myotonic dystrophy 1 in the nervous system: From the clinic to molecular mechanisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
卷 86, 期 1, 页码 18-26

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.21377

关键词

myotonic dystrophy 1; nervous system; expanded triplet repeats; Tau protein; MBNL proteins

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a dominant neuromuscular disorder caused by the expansion of trinucleotide CTG repeats in the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR) of the DMPK gene. Prominent features of classical DM1 are muscle wasting and myotonia, whereas mental retardation is distinctive for congenital DM1. The main nervous system symptoms of DM1 are cognitive impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, and personality and behavior abnormalities. It is thought that expansion of CTG repeats causes DM1 pathology through different molecular mechanisms; however, a growing body of evidence indicates that an RNA gain-of-function mechanism plays a major role in the disease development. At the skeletal muscle level, three main molecular events can be distinguished in this model: 1) formation of nuclear foci that are composed at least of mutant DMPK mRNA and recruited RNA-binding proteins, such as splicing regulators and transcription factors; 2) disturbance of alternative splicing of specific genes; and 3) impairment of cell differentiation. Contrasting with the substantial advances in understanding DM1 muscle pathology, the molecular basis of DM1 in the nervous system has just started to be revealed. This review focuses in the DM1 nervous system pathology and provides an overview of the genetic and molecular studies analyzing the effects of the DMPK gene CUG expanded repeats on cell function in neuronal systems. A comparison between the molecular mechanisms of DM1 in the skeletal muscle and those identified in DM1 nervous system models is provided. Finally, future directions in the study of DM1 in the nervous system are discussed. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss,inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据