4.5 Article

ESR1 and EGF genetic variation in relation to breast cancer risk and survival

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1861

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA104021] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 104021, R01 CA104021] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Oestrogen exposure is a central factor in the development of breast cancer. Oestrogen receptor alpha ( ESR1) is the main mediator of oestrogen effect in breast epithelia and has also been shown to be activated by epidermal growth factor ( EGF). We sought to determine if common genetic variation in the ESR1 and EGF genes affects breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics or breast cancer survival. Methods We genotyped 157 single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) in ESR1 and 54 SNPs in EGF in 92 Swedish controls and selected haplotype tagging SNPs ( tagSNPs) that could predict both single SNP and haplotype variation in the genes with an R-2 of at least 0.8. The tagSNPs were genotyped in 1,590 breast cancer cases and 1,518 controls, and their association with breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics and survival were assessed using unconditional logistic regression models, Cox proportional hazard models and haplotype analysis. Results The single tagSNP analysis did not reveal association evidence for breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics, or survival. A multi- locus analysis of five adjacent tagSNPs suggested a region in ESR1 ( between rs3003925 and rs2144025) for association with breast cancer risk ( p = 0.001), but the result did not withstand adjustment for multiple comparisons ( p = 0.086). A similar region was also implicated by haplotype analyses, but its significance needs to be verified by follow- up analysis. Conclusion Our results do not support a strong association between common variants in the ESR1 and EGF genes and breast cancer risk, tumour characteristics or survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据