4.5 Article

PIK3CA-activating mutations and chemotherapy sensitivity in stage II-IIIbreast cancer

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr1984

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA016672, R01CA106290] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Funding Source: Custom
  3. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA106290, 2P30CA016672 28, R01-CA106290, P30 CA016672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction In vitro evidence suggests that PIK3CAphosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, catalytic, alpha polypeptide) activation may be associated with altered chemotherapy sensitivity in cancer. Methods Tumor DNA from 140 patients with stage II - III breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy was sequenced for PIK3CA mutations on exons 1, 9, and 20. Mutation status was correlated with clinical/pathological parameters and chemotherapy response as (a) pathological complete response (pCR) versus residual cancer or (b) quantitative residual cancer burden (RCB) scores, including stratification for estrogen receptor (ER) expression status, type of chemotherapy, and by exons. Results Twenty-three patients (16.4%) harbored a PIK3CA mutation, with 12, 11, and 0 mutations located in exons 9, 20, and 1, respectively. PIK3CA exon 9 mutations were more frequent among node-negative (52% versus 25%; P = 0.012) than node-positive tumors, particularly among ER-positive tumors. pCR rates and RCB scores were similar among patients with the wild-type and mutant PIK3CA genes, even after stratification by ER status, chemotherapy regimen (anthracycline versus anthracycline plus paclitaxel), or exon. Conclusion PIK3CA mutations are not associated with altered sensitivity to preoperative anthracycline-based or taxane-based chemotherapies in ER-positive and ER-negative breast tumors. In this study, PIK3CA mutation was associated with a decreased rate of node-positive disease, particularly among ER-positive tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据