4.4 Article

Intra-median raphe nucleus (MRN) infusions of muscimol, a GABA-A receptor agonist, reinstate alcohol seeking in rats: role of impulsivity and rewardd

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 195, 期 4, 页码 605-615

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-007-0943-4

关键词

alcohol; GABA receptor; raphe; relapse; serotonin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale We previously found that the inhibition of median raphe nucleus (MRN) 5-HT transmission by local injections of a 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT or corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) mimic the effect of foot shock stress to reinstate alcohol seeking. In this study, we further explored the role of the MRN by examining the effect of inhibition of MRN neurons, by injecting the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol, on the reinstatement of alcohol seeking. Materials and methods Male rats were trained to lever press for 12% alcohol. Cannulae were implanted aimed at the MRN; some rats were also given intra-MRN injections of 5,7-DHT to destroy ascending 5-HT neurons. After retraining, alcohol responding was extinguished for 14 days. Subsequently, we tested the effect of muscimol injections into the MRN (0, 12.5, 25, 50 ng) on reinstatement. We also tested the effect of MRN muscimol injections on a measure of reward, conditioned place preference (CPP) and performance in the five-choice serial reaction time task (5-CSRTT), which tests a variety of psychological processes including sustained attention and impulsivity. Results MRN muscimol injections strongly reinstated alcohol seeking and this effect was not reversed by the depletion of 5-HT with 5,7-DHT. MRN muscimol injections did not induce a CPP, but did significantly impair multiple aspects of performance on the 5-CSRTT, including a marked increase in premature, or impulsive, responding. Conclusions Together with our previous findings, these results suggest that the inhibition of MRN projection neurons provokes alcohol seeking. Results from the 5-CSRTT suggest that increased impulsivity may contribute to these effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据