4.7 Article

Monocytes, but not T or B cells, are the principal target cells for dengue virus (DV) infection among human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 134-146

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.21051

关键词

dengue; monocyte; enhancement

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A better understanding of the pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever and dengue shock syndrome requires the precise identification of dengue virus (DV) permissive target cells. To examine the relative DV permissiveness among cell subsets, we inoculated unfractionated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with DV2-16681 in the presence or absence of pooled DV-immune human sera (PHS), and assessed infection with fluorescent dye labeled DV-specific monoclonal antibody and cell surface markers using flow cytometry. We found significantly higher levels of DV antigen staining on DV-infected than mock-infected primary monocytes (3.54 +/- 3.42% vs. 0.50 +/- 0.38%; P=0.001). The magnitude of infection was markedly enhanced in the presence of highly diluted PHS (10.04 +/- 6.10% vs. 3.54 +/- 3.42%; P=0.015). Under identical experimental conditions, primary T or B cells were not infected either with or without the addition of PHS (0.06 +/- 0.04% and 0.44 +/- 0.22% for T and B cells, respectively). Furthermore depletion of CD14+ monocytes prior to D inoculation abrogated the detection of infected cells, and the addition of monoclonal antibodies to either Fc gamma Rl (CD64) or Fc gamma Rll (CD32) led to a 50-70% reduction in anti body-dependent enhancement (ADE) of DV infection. Collectively, these results provide further support to the notion that primary monocytes and Fc gamma Rs expressed on these cells may be important in the initial steps of immune enhancement observed in some patients with natural DV infection. They also demonstrate that using modern experimental technology, DV infection, and neutralization and enhancement of DV infection can be easily assessed simultaneously in multiple cell types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据