4.4 Article

Optimizing Pedotransfer Functions for Estimating Soil Bulk Density Using Boosted Regression Trees

期刊

SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 485-493

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0241

关键词

-

资金

  1. Indo-French Centre for the Promotion of Advanced Research, IFCPAR [2909-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to estimate certain soil properties that are difficult and costly to measure front others more easily available. Bulk density is one important soil property. Although nor requiring complex analysis, its measurement remains time consuming and is lacking in many soil surveys. For several decades, PTFs have been developed for predicting soil bulk density. Most of these PTFs are suited only for specific agro-pedo-climatic conditions, however, and can be applied only within a limited geographic area. In this study, we derived and experimented with two new PTFs based on a multiple additive regression trees (MART) method, and assessed their performance compared with existing PTFs when applied to a country-level soil database, the Reseau de Mesures de la Qualite des Sols (RMQS) survey network. This database was designed to include the major soil types and land uses in France. The first proposed PTF (Model m) involves only three predictors typically found in the existing PTFs for bulk density (C content and texture) and the second one (Model M) includes eight easily accessible quantitative and qualitative predictors (e.g., soil taxon). Both models significantly outperformed existing PTFs. Without arbitrarily partitioning the data set before fitting the model, the m and M MART models yielded R-2 values of 0.83 and 0.94, respectively. The predictive quality on independent data, assessed using cross-validation, was also improved compared with published PTFs, with R-2 reaching 0.62 and 0.66 and root mean square prediction errors of 0.123 and 0.117 Mg m(-3) for the two MAPT models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据