4.3 Article

Expression and pH-dependence of the Photosystem II Subunit S from Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 1479-1484

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.6.1479

关键词

Photosystem II subunit S; Expression; pH dependence; Temperature dependence

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0075586]
  2. Pusan National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2009-0075586] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photosynthesis uses light energy to drive the oxidation of water at an oxygen-evolving catalytic site within photosystem II (PSII). Chlorophyll binding by the photosystem II subunit S protein, PsbS, was found lobe necessary for energy-dependent quenching (qE), the major energy-dependent component of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) in Arabidopsis thulium. It is proposed that PsbS acts as a trigger of the conformational change that leads to the establishment of nonphotochemical quenching. However, the exact structure and function of PsbS in PSII are still unknown. Here, we clone and express the recombinant PsbS gene from Arabidopsis thaliana in E. coli and purify the resulting homogeneous protein. We used various biochemical and biophysical techniques to elucidate PsbS structure and function, including circular dichroism (CD), fluorescence, and DSC. The protein shows optimal stability at 4 degrees C and pH 7.5. The CD spectra of PsbS show that the conformational changes of the protein were strongly dependent on pH conditions. The CD curve for PsbS at pH 10.5 curve had the deepest negative peak and the peak of PsbS at pH 4.5 was the least negative. The fluorescence emission spectrum of the purified PsbS protein was also measured, and the lambda(max) was found to be at 328 nm. PsbS revealed some structural changes under varying temperature and oxygen gas condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据