4.4 Review

Hard Magnetic Ferrite: ε-Fe2O3

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 86, 期 8, 页码 897-907

出版社

CHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20130120

关键词

-

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) project of JST
  2. JSPS
  3. NEXT program from JSPS
  4. Global COE Program, Chemistry Innovation through Cooperation of Science and Engineering from MEXT Japan
  5. Photon Frontier Network Program from MEXT
  6. DOWA Techno Fund
  7. Asahi Glass Foundation
  8. MEXT Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron oxide Fe2O3 has four polymorphs: alpha-, beta-, gamma-, and epsilon-phases. alpha-Fe2O3 (hematite) and gamma-Fe2O3 (maghemite) are abundant in nature, whereas beta- and epsilon-Fe2O3 phases are very rare and must be artificially synthesized in the laboratory. Pure epsilon-Fe2O3 phase was first synthesized in 2004 using a combination of reverse-micelle and sol-gel techniques, and it shows the largest coercive field value (H-e) among metal oxide-based magnets of 20 kOe at room temperature. Successively, several kinds of metal-substituted epsilon-iron oxides, epsilon-MxFe2-xO3 (M = In, Ga, and Al), have been synthesized, and their magnetic properties are controlled by the degree of the metal substitution. Such iron oxides with a high H-c are attractive from industrial application viewpoints, e.g., magnetic recordings and electromagnetic wave absorbers. A series of epsilon-MxFe2-xO3 shows high-frequency electromagnetic wave absorption due to zero-field ferromagnetic resonance at 35-182 GHz in the millimeter range, which is useful for next-generation high-speed wireless communications. In this article, we describe (i) the synthesis, crystal structure, and magnetic properties of epsilon-Fe2O3, (ii) generation mechanism of epsilon-Fe2O3, the origin of the gigantic coercive field, and theoretical analysis of magnetic ordering, (iii) metal-substituted epsilon-iron oxides, epsilon-MxFe2-xO3, and (iv) electromagnetic wave absorption in the millimeter wave range.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据