4.5 Article

What Did I Say? Versus What Did I Think? Attributing False Beliefs to Self Amongst Children With and Without Autism

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-009-0695-6

关键词

Autism spectrum disorder; Theory of mind; False belief; Unexpected contents task; Self-awareness

资金

  1. Department of Health Funding Source: Medline
  2. ESRC [ES/F016638/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Economic and Social Research Council [ES/F016638/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The task used most widely to assess recognition of false belief in self and others is the 'Smarties' unexpected contents task. Amongst individuals with and without autism, the Self and Other-person test questions of this task are of an equivalent level of difficulty. However, a potential confound with this task may allow the Self test question to be passed without false belief competence. Three groups of participants (with autism, developmental disability and typical development) undertook a new unexpected contents task which did not suffer from this confound. The main finding was that participants with autism performed significantly less well on the Self test question than the Other-person test question on this new task. Individuals with autism may have greater difficulty representing their own beliefs than the beliefs of other people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据