4.7 Article

INTEGRATION OF UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION AND FIELD CAMPAIGNS A Case Study from Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
卷 95, 期 10, 页码 1595-1601

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00209.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF EAGER Award [AGS-1212279]
  2. NSF Award [ATM-0918010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An undergraduate course was taught at the University of North Dakota (UND) that examined the objectives and motivation of the Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) field campaign. The course included discussions about particular challenges involved in making chemical transport measurements and field campaign forecasts; hands-on forecasting exercises for all three DC3 regions were also included. Subsequently, UND undergraduate students traveled to the University of Alabama in Huntsville to participate in DC3 campaign operations. While in the field, students actively participated in radiosonde operations (including instrument preparation and launch, field log documentation, and data quality control) as well as mission planning and daily forecast discussions. During the field period, a hands-on internship was held at UND that gave both graduate and undergraduate students a chance to forecast for the campaign (offline) and then listen in on the live forecast discussion. Formal assessment of the undergraduate course, the forecasting internship, and the campaign participation showed that students found all components valuable. Students gained experience in a variety of forecasting scenarios, forecast model evaluation, and field campaign decision making. This project represented a relatively inexpensive method to leverage the significant resources invested in field campaigns for greater educational gains. Recommendations are provided such that more colleges and universities can take advantage of opportunities to become educational partners with field campaign investigators in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据