4.7 Article

A NEW AIR-SEA INTERACTION GRIDDED DATASET FROM ICOADS WITH UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATES

期刊

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2639.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Oceans2025
  2. NERC
  3. Ministry of Defence
  4. NERC [soc010012] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [soc010012] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exchange, or flux, of heat between the oceans and atmosphere is an important driver of the global oceanic and atmospheric circulations but remains poorly quantified. Direct measurement of heat flux remains a research activity and so global heat flux datasets are generated using observations of winds, air and sea temperatures, and humidity as input to heat flux parameterizations known as bulk formulas. We remain dependent on the observations from merchant ships in the Voluntary Observing Ships (VOS) program, which are archived in the International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Dataset (ICOADS); measurements from buoys are sparse and satellites cannot accurately recover all the variables required for heat flux calculation. Careful analysis of VOS data is necessary to produce gridded data-sets of meteorological variables and fluxes with the accuracy required for climate research. Past in situ flux datasets have averaged observations on monthly timescales to reduce random uncertainty. It has therefore been hard to understand the contributions to observed variability from measurement errors, poor sampling, or natural variability. The new dataset, which covers the period 1973 to 2006, avoids this problem by first constructing daily mean fields using optimal interpolation. This allows each component of variability to be handled correctly and, for the first time, uncertainty estimates to be produced. New bias adjustments have also been developed and applied. The new dataset is described and a preliminary comparison with flux estimates from moored buoys, satellites, and atmospheric reanalysis models is presented.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据