4.3 Article

Mutations and polymorphisms in the SDHB, SDHD, VHL, and RET genes in sporadic and familial pheochromocytomas

期刊

ENDOCRINE
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 347-355

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-009-9178-y

关键词

Pheochromocytoma; Genetics; Mutations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence of germ line mutations within the RET-protooncogene and the tumor suppressor genes SDHB, SDHD, and VHL in pheochromocytomas (PC) varies in recent studies from 12 to 24%, if one look at them collectively. DNA was extracted from frozen tumor tissue as well as from blood leukocytes of 36 PC (26 sporadic/10 MEN2). Exons 1-8 of the SDHB-gene, 1-4 of the SDHD-gene, 1-3 of the VHL-gene, and exons 10, 11, 13, 14, 16 of the RET-gene were amplified by PCR and analyzed by DHPLC with the Transgenomic WAVE(A (R))-System. Samples with aberrant wave profiles were subjected to direct sequencing. Genetic aberrations were correlated to clinical characteristics. Germ line mutations in sporadic PC were identified in four patients (11%) whereas somatic mutations were observed in two (5%) patients. Nine coding polymorphisms (PM) were identified in seven (19%) patients. Intronic variants were observed in six (17%) patients and were all located in the SHDB gene. Patients with wild type alleles in all assessed genes were older (53 vs. 37 years, P = 0.007) and presented with an increased tumor size (49 vs. 32 mm, P = 0.003) compared to patients with mutations. Malignant PC revealed multiple (> 2) genetic alterations more frequently than benign PC (4/7 vs. 4/29, P = 0.03). Interestingly intronic variants of the SDHB gene occur more frequently in malignant than in benign PC (3/7 vs. 2/29, P = 0.04). The frequency of germ line mutations in sporadic pheochromocytomas was lower in our cohort than previously reported. Polymorphisms of the RET gene are common (17%) and occur in familial and sporadic PC. Multiple genetic alterations including mutations, polymorphisms and intronic variants are more frequently observed in malignant PC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据