4.6 Article

A Prospective Study of the Safety of Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy During Pregnancy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 519-524

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv079

关键词

Endoscopy; inflammatory bowel disease; pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Women with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] have a higher risk of undergoing gastrointestinal [GI] endoscopy during pregnancy than healthy women. Data on endoscopic procedures during pregnancy in IBD women are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of lower GI endoscopy during pregnancy in IBD women. Methods: All consecutive IBD women who underwent endoscopy during pregnancy [cases] from 2008-2014 were prospectively included. Cases were matched 1: 1 on age, IBD medication, and disease activity with pregnant IBD patients without endoscopy during pregnancy [controls]. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between the cases and controls. Adverse events [AEs] were assessed for a temporal relation and for an aetiological relation with the endoscopy. Results: In total, 42 pregnant IBD patients [19 Crohn's disease, 23 ulcerative colitis] underwent 47 lower GI endoscopies [12 colonoscopies/35 sigmoidoscopies]. Median maternal age was 30 years [interquartile range: 28-32]. Two spontaneous abortions were temporally and probably related to endoscopy; however, spontaneous abortion did not occur more often in cases than in controls (2 [4.8%] vs 10 [23.8%], p 0.01). Median birthweight was significantly lower in the cases compared with controls [3 017 g vs 3 495 g, p 0.01]. There were no significant differences in terms of gestational age at birth, congenital abnormalities, or APGAR scores. Conclusion: Although lower GI endoscopy in pregnant IBD women should only be performed when strongly indicated, we report no increased adverse outcomes for the mother or the newborn related to endoscopy in any of the three trimesters of pregnancy compared with controls.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据