4.1 Article

FLUCTUATIONS IN RANGE AND ABUNDANCE OF SNOW CRAB (CHIONOECETES OPILIO) FROM THE EASTERN BERING SEA: WHAT ROLE FOR PACIFIC COD (GADUS MACROCEPHALIIS) PREDATION?

期刊

BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 57-81

出版社

ROSENSTIEL SCH MAR ATMOS SCI
DOI: 10.5343/bms.2011.1137

关键词

-

资金

  1. North Pacific Research Board (NPRB) [508, 624]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluctuations in abundance of commercially valuable crustacean stocks in sub-Arctic ecosystems have been variously attributed to the effects of climatic forcing, fishing pressure, and predation, mostly by gadoid fishes. Landings of snow crab, Chionoecetes opilio (J. C. Fabricius, 1788), from the eastern Bering Sea declined after the early 1990s, reaching historical lows a decade later. At the same time, two phenomena became apparent in the dynamics of the primiparae (first-time female breeders): their geographic range contracted to the northwest along the middle shelf (50-100 m depth), and the contraction was punctuated by periodic recruitment to the mature female pool, with a period of approximately 7 yrs and declining amplitude. The first phenomenon has been addressed by the environmental ratchet hypothesis, which attributes the contraction to a combination of an ontogenetic female migration, circulation patterns, the spatial dynamics of benthic stages in relation to near-bottom temperature, and predation by Pacific sod, Gadus macrocephalus Tilesius, 1810. Mortality due to cod predation in the Middle Domain, apparently related to near-bottom temperature, increased after 1995, contributing to the ratchet effect and the disappearance of periodic pulses of primipara abundance. Cod predation does not, however, appear to have controlled the frequency of periodic recruitment fluctuations. On the other hand, amplitude of fluctuations of primipara abundance in the Middle Domain, purportedly the engine of renewal of this stock, do appear to be affected by both predation and climate, whose interaction is complex but perhaps interpretable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据