4.5 Article

Risk factors and outcomes associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation during acute respiratory distress syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 994-997

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.06.003

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Interleukins; Troponin; Epinephrine; Mortality; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute [K01HL116768-01, 2R01HL092577]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Outcomes and risk factors associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are unclear. We investigated mortality and risk factors associated with new-onset AF during ARDS. Materials and methods: We obtained data from the ARDS Network Albuterol for Treatment of Acute Lung Injury trial, which prospectively identified new-onset AF among patients with ARDS as an adverse event. We determined Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III-adjusted associations between new-onset AF and 90-day mortality. We also examined associations between new-onset AF and markers of inflammation (interleukin 6 and interleukin 8), myocardial injury (troponin I), autonomic activation (epinephrine), and atrial stretch (central venous pressure) as well as other clinical characteristics. Measurements and main results: Of 282 patients (mean age, 51.6 years; 45% women; 77% white) enrolled in Albuterol for Treatment of Acute Lung Injury, 28 (10%) developed new-onset AF during the study. We did not identify associations between new-onset AF and baseline central venous pressure, plasma levels of troponin I, epinephrine, interleukin 6, or interleukin 8. New-onset AF during ARDS was associated with increased 90-day mortality (new-onset AF, 43% vs no new-onset AF, 19%; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-adjusted odds ratio, 3.09 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-7.72]; P = .02). Conclusion: New-onset AF during ARDS is associated with increased mortality; however, its mechanisms require further study. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据