4.5 Article

Pattern of soluble CD5 and CD6 lymphocyte receptors in critically ill patients with septic syndromes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 914-919

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.04.120

关键词

CD5; CD6; Sepsis; Systemic inflammatory response syndrome

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2010-19717]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR1101, 2010TEM37]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (REIPI) [RD06/0008/1013, RD12/0015/0018]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BES-2008-005544]
  5. Spanish Ministry of Education [JCI-2008-3294]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Soluble forms of CD5 and CD6 lymphocyte surface receptors (sCD5 and sCD6) are molecules that seem to prevent experimental sepsis when exogenously administered. The aim of this study was to assess sCD5 and sCD6 levels in patients with septic syndromes. Materials and methods: The study population consisted of 218 patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) presenting either septic syndromes or noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome at admission or within the first 48 hours. The sCD5 and sCD6 levels were analyzed by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: Almost 50% of the patients had undetectable levels of sCD5 or sCD6, with no differences in clinical or biological variables with detectable patients. There was a correlation between the delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and both sCD6 and sCD5 levels in all groups. Patients with sCD5 or sCD6 levels greater than 1500 ng/mL presented a higher in-ICU mortality (P < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that increased sCD6 levels were associated with an increased risk of in-ICU mortality. Conclusions: Levels of sCD5 and sCD6 in critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome present a high variation and an elevated proportion of undetectability. Levels of sCD6 are associated with an increased risk of mortality in these patients. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据