4.6 Article

Do liquidity measures measure liquidity?

期刊

JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 153-181

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.06.002

关键词

Liquidity; Transaction costs; Effective spread; Price impact; Asset pricing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the key role of liquidity in finance research, identifying high quality proxies based oil daily (as opposed to intraday) data Would permit liquidity to be studied over relatively long timeframes and across many countries. Using new measures and widely employed measures in the literature, we run horseraces of annual and monthly estimates of each measure against liquidity benchmarks. Our benchmarks are effective spread, realized spread, and price impact based on both Trade and Quote (TAQ) and Rule 605 data. We find that the new effective/realized spread measures win the majority of horseraces, while the Amihud [2002. Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets 5, 31-56] measure does well measuring price impact. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据