4.2 Article

Adoption vs acceptance of e-commerce: two different decisions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING
卷 43, 期 9-10, 页码 1232-1245

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/03090560910976465

关键词

Internet shopping; E-commerce; Consumer behaviour

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - The main objective of this paper is to compare the differences that exist between the adoption of e-commerce by potential purchasers and the acceptance of the channel (re-purchase decisions) by experienced c-customers; Therefore, the paper seeks to test the influence of online shopping experience on electronic purchase decisions. Design/methodology/approach - The conceptual model, an extended technology acceptance model (TAM), is tested using structural equation modelling techniques In addition, the variations that exist in e-customer behaviour are checked using a multi-sampling analysis. Findings - The findings show that the influence of self-efficacy and usefulness increases as the consumer gains online shopping experience The motivations that lead a potential e-customer to make a purchase are not the same as those that influence an experienced customer The paper demonstrates the evolution of customer behaviour and the need to differentiate the perceptions of consumers depending on their level of experience. Practical implications - The analysis of e-customer behaviour is a key issue for the development of e-retailing. Better knowledge about the evolution of consumer behaviour allows a better management of the e-customer-firm relationship (e-business) Finns should bear in mind the relevant perceptions of e-customers for each decision. Originality/value - Despite the importance that researchers have attached to studying e-shopping behaviour, not many papers have considered the existence of different types of decision. In fact, the majority only consider an initial stage of e-commerce and do not analyse the evolution of e-customer behaviour and the differences observed with respect to acceptance. The paper fills this gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据