4.2 Article

Evaluation of the thermal performance of an innovative prefabricated natural plant fibre building system

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0143624412450023

关键词

Natural fibre; guarded hot box; prefabricated; heat transfer coefficient; insulation materials

资金

  1. Technology Strategy Board

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy efficient new and retrofit building construction relies heavily on the use of thermal insulation. A focus on the environmental performance of current construction materials with regards to both embodied energy and energy in-use has resulted in a growing interest in the use of natural fibre insulation materials. The results of heat flow meter thermal conductivity tests on a range of straw samples of different densities are presented. The innovative use of straw in the development of a prefabricated straw-bale panel and the results of guarded hot-box testing are presented. In common with most building materials, there is a degree of uncertainty in the thermal conductivity due to the influences of temperature, moisture content and density; however, from evaluation of a range of the literature and experimental data, a value of 0.064W/mK is proposed as a representative design value for straw bales at the densities used in building construction. Computer simulation and experimental testing suggest that the overall heat transfer coefficient (U-value) for the complete prefabricated panel is approximately 0.178W/m(2)K. This article also briefly discusses the use of this innovative unit in a highly instrumented test building constructed at the University of Bath. Practical application: Knowledge of the thermal properties of building materials is necessary for evaluation of energy performance of the building envelope and appraisal of retrofit fabric improvements. The presentation of robust data for the thermal properties of straw will be of interest to designers developing projects employing this natural fibre insulation material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据