4.5 Article

Household energy consumption: a study of the role of occupants

期刊

BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION
卷 37, 期 5-6, 页码 625-637

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09613210903186661

关键词

behaviour; building stock; energy consumption; housing; inhabitant; residential; US

资金

  1. UK's Engineering and Physical Science Research Council [EP/F007560/1]
  2. EPSRC [EP/E040748/1, EP/F007566/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E040748/1, EP/F007566/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To what extent is energy performance determined by interactions between occupants, behaviour and buildings systems, as well as building and climate characteristics? The purpose of this paper is to establish which factors, and to what extent, affect the energy performance of a housing stock. The US residential sector is used to test the relative roles of socio-economic and behavioural aspects of occupants, as compared with climatic and physical building characteristics. Household heating and cooling energy consumption is investigated using an existing extensive survey, the Residential Energy Consumption Survey (RECS) by the US Department of Energy. This data set consists of information on actual energy consumption along with detailed energy-related characteristics of the housing units and their occupants. The paper presents a statistical analysis of the housing stock and assesses the relative roles of variables on energy use. Regression models and path analysis are used to determine the significance of parameters and their interrelationships. Results reveal that apart from climate, occupant behavioural aspects and socio-economic aspects are critical, partly directly and also significantly indirectly through their influence on choices and decisions about the physical characteristics of buildings and systems. Models are created for the analysis of heating and cooling energy that can be used to explore energy-related policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据