4.7 Article

Analyses of the improvement of subway station thermal environment in northern severe cold regions

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 143, 期 -, 页码 579-590

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.039

关键词

Subway station; Piston effect; Thermal environment; Severe cold regions; PBD

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50278075]
  2. Research on Key Technology of Thermal Environment Control of Subway Station in Northern China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, subway lines are being increasingly constructed in the northern severe cold regions of China. The average ambient temperature in this region is below -10 degrees C during winter. Therefore, the extreme climate and piston effect impose challenges for designers for enhancing the thermal environment of a metro station in severe cold season. In this study, one-dimensional modelling is developed using the IDA Simulation Environment (IDA) based on an actual metro line, and the results are validated by experimental data. Moreover, the thermal environment of a typical metro station in the control group, two traditional optimisation measures, and one new method are investigated in severe cold regions. The results indicate that the primary heat loss during winter is attributed to the cold air invasion caused by the piston effect from the entrances. The addition of a warm-air curtain individually at the entrance may not effectively prevent the intrusion of cold air. Furthermore, adding a door curtain can reduce the inlet air volume of the entrance, but reduce the outlet air volume of the entrance. Thus, the heat of the train brake cannot be effectively utilised to improve the station temperature. In addition, one new method using the piston wind principle was presented, and it can effectively prevent the cold wind and more effectively utilise the train braking energy to improve the temperature of the metro station. It serves as a guideline for subway environmental control system (ECS) design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据