4.7 Article

Development of an optimum design program (SUSB-OPTIMUM) for the life cycle CO2 assessment of an apartment house in Korea

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 40-54

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.015

关键词

Apartment house; Life cycle; CO2; Economic efficiency; Optimum design; SUSB-OPTIMUM

资金

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government [13CHUD-C060439-03-000000]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [60438] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the applicability of an optimum design program (SUSB-OPTIMUM) for the life cycle CO2 assessment of an apartment house that can be readily utilized during the planning and design phases. For this purpose, a database containing information on the CO2-reducing performance and the cost of environmentally-friendly construction technologies that are applicable to apartment houses was constructed, and an interpretation program was built based on a simplified technique for assessing the life cycle CO2 emissions of an apartment house and the unit costs based on the inter-industry relation table. In addition, by integrating the interpretation program with an optimum design system based on an evolutionary algorithm, an optimum design system was created to compute the optimal solution with regard to the life cycle CO2 emissions and economic feasibility of apartment buildings. The applicability of the optimum design program developed in this study was evaluated by means of a case study. The case study results revealed that it is possible to compute the optimum combination of environmentally-friendly construction technologies, as well as the quantity of life cycle CO2 emissions and costs in order to reach a CO2 emissions target at a cost comparable to that of a standard apartment house. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据