4.7 Article

Thermal comfort in buildings with split air-conditioners in hot-humid area of China

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 213-224

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.09.009

关键词

Thermal comfort; Buildings with split air-conditioners; Hot-humid area; Thermal adaptation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [50708038, 50838003]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University
  3. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science of China [2011ZB09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Occupants' thermal sensations, perceptions and behaviors in buildings with split air-conditioners in hot-humid area of China were systematically investigated for a whole year with longitudinal design. Thirty college students, naturally acclimatized to local climate and well experienced with the indoor environments of buildings, participated in the present study. They reported their thermal sensations, perceptions and behaviors in questionnaires while their ambient environmental variables were measured. A close match of indoor and outdoor climate was found. Thermal sensation was found to be a linear function of ET* or SET and thermal neutrality was 25.6 degrees C in ET* or 24.9 degrees C in SET. The central five categories of the ASHRAE 9-point thermal sensation scale were found to be acceptable and the 90% (80%) acceptable range of thermal environment was found to be 20.6-30.5 degrees C (16.9-34.2 degrees C) in ET*. The adaptive behaviors of clothing adjustment, opening windows and using fans were found to be closely correlated with indoor ET*. The split air-conditioners were used from May to October and turned on most often at midnight with indoor air temperature of 30.1 degrees C and setting temperature of 26.1 degrees C. Compared with those from naturally ventilated buildings, the occupants from buildings with split air-conditioners kept indoor climates much cooler, used adaptive opportunities much earlier and perceived their ambient environments more sensitively and rigidly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据