4.7 Article

An adaptive thermal comfort model for hot humid South-East Asia

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 291-300

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.03.021

关键词

Naturally ventilated building; Meta-analysis; Adaptive thermal comfort; South-East Asia; Hot humid climate

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam [624/QD-BGDDT]
  2. Wallonie Bruxelles International [DWBH/FP/vtd/V084/2011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present paper presents a full procedure to develop an adaptive comfort model for South-East Asia. Meta-analysis on large number of observations from field surveys which were conducted in this region was employed. Standardization and bias control of the database were fully reported. Statistical tests of significance and weighted regression method applied in the analyses strengthened the reliability of the findings. This paper found a great influence of 'Griffiths constant' on the establishment of adaptive comfort equation and proposed an appropriate 'value. The adaptive comfort model generated is applicable to naturally ventilated building under hot and humid conditions of South-East Asia. The mean neutral comfort temperature (operative temperature, effective temperature, standard effective temperature) in naturally ventilated and air-conditioned l building was compared and the differences have been discussed. The similar neutral standard effective temperature in both naturally ventilated and air-conditioned building proposes a new idea to implement SET* into building simulation tools to assess thermal comfort without the attention of building classification. Through the analysis, the effectiveness of behavioral adaptive actions on occupant's thermal perception has been argued. The extended PMV-PPD model for hot humid conditions was examined and its applicability was recommended. Other comfort-related issues, the differences and similarities between various adaptive comfort models were also addressed. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据