4.7 Article

Characterization of green roof components: Measurements of thermal and hydrological properties

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 78-85

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.024

关键词

Green roofs; Characterization; Sorption isotherms; Porosimetry; Thermal conductivity; Evapotranspiration

资金

  1. French Research National Agency (ANR) through the Habitat intelligent et solaire photovoltaique program (project AGROBAT) [ANR-09-HABISOL-001]
  2. Poitou-Charentes region through the excellence environnementale project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three of the main physical properties of green roofs were experimentally investigated to determine some of the key green roof modeling parameters. First, the thermo-physical properties of green roofs were characterized by correlating the thermal conductivity of the substrate with the water content for different substrates and maximum water capacities. Next, the moisture storage was characterized using the dynamic vapor sorption technique to determine both the sorption and desorption isotherms for three different temperatures as well as the moisture buffer capacity. Third, the microstructural properties of green roof substrate were characterized using mercury intrusion porosimetry to measure the porosity range of the substrate and to compare this porosity range with different concrete porosities. In addition to these characterizations, the evapotranspiration term, which is very important in the water balance, was measured. The few studies found in literature provide the expression of the evapotranspiration term for a watered grass and vegetated areas on a large scale. In this study, this term is expressed for the experimentally studied green roof complex (substrate + vegetation). The ultimate objective of these experiments is to estimate the parameters used as input data in the developed green roof model to evaluate the energy performance of a building. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据