4.7 Article

Subjective study of thermal acceptability of novel enhanced displacement ventilation system and implication of occupants' personal control

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 49-57

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.04.004

关键词

Enhanced displacement ventilation; Thermal comfort; Thermal acceptability; Fans; Personal control

资金

  1. International Center for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark
  2. National University of Singapore [R-296-000-107-112]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel air distribution principle of cooler air near the floor level being propelled upward via four fans mounted at each corner of a chair was developed to enhance the performance of conventional displacement ventilation (DV) system. Experiments were conducted in a well-controlled climate chamber with DV and constant heat load at different supply air temperatures, namely 20, 22, and 24 degrees C and room air temperatures, 22, 24, and 26 degrees C. Subjective assessments were carried out with 32 tropically-acclimatized college students who were given the choice to adjust the fan speed. Subjects' thermal comfort and the implication of personal usage pattern of the enhanced DV system were studied. The results revealed that at the ambient temperature of 26 degrees C, subjects preferred higher air movement and were satisfied with the cooling provided by the fans. However, the subjects felt cooler at the waists at room air temperatures of 22 and 24 degrees C when the fans were in operation. It was also found that the Whole Body Thermal Sensation (WBTS) reported by the subjects was correlated with the Local Thermal Sensation (LTS) at the waist, the arms, the calf and the feet when the novel DV system was employed. An expression which allows predicting WBTS based on the LTS was developed. Recommendations for fan speed at different room air temperatures were derived. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据