Numerical study of a M-cycle cross-flow heat exchanger for indirect evaporative cooling

In this paper numerical analyses of the thermal performance of an indirect evaporative air cooler incorporating a M-cycle cross-flow heat exchanger has been carried out The numerical model was established from solving the coupled governing equations for heat and mass transfer between the product and working air using the finite-element method The model was developed using the EES (Engineering Equation Solver) environment and validated by published experimental data Correlation between the cooling (wet-bulb) effectiveness system COP and a number of air flow/exchanger parameters was developed It is found that lower channel air velocity lower inlet air relative humidity and higher working-to-product air ratio yielded higher cooling effectiveness The recommended average air velocities in dry and wet channels should not be greater than 1 77 m/s and 07 m/s respectively The optimum flow ratio of working-to-product air for this cooler is 50% The channel geometric sizes i e channel length and height also impose significant impact to system performance Longer channel length and smaller channel height contribute to increase of the system cooling effectiveness but lead to reduced system COP The recommend channel height is 4 mm and the dimensionless channel length i e ratio of the channel length to height should be in the range 100 to 300 Numerical study results indicated that this new type of M-cycle heat and mass exchanger can achieve 167% higher cooling effectiveness compared with the conventional cross-flow heat and mass exchanger for the indirect evaporative cooler The model of this kind is new and not yet reported in literatures The results of the study help with design and performance analyses of such a new type of indirect evaporative air cooler and in further help increasing market rating of the technology within building air conditioning sector which is currently dominated by the conventional compression refrigeration technology (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved