4.7 Article

Tracer gas experiment for local mean ages of air from individual supply inlets in a space with multiple inlets

期刊

BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 46, 期 12, 页码 2462-2471

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.05.023

关键词

Ventilation; Experiment; Local mean age; Tracer gas; Multiple inlets; Livestock building

资金

  1. Korean government [09-0260]
  2. Kookmin University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate the supply characteristics of incoming air via individual inlets in a ventilated space with multiple inlets. Theoretical considerations are given to determine the relations between the local mean age (LMA) of the total supply air and the individual LMA of each supply air inlet. Tracer gas experiments are conducted in a simplified livestock model with two supply inlets and one exhaust outlet. Transient concentration responses at internal points are measured after tracer gas injection one inlet at a time, and for simultaneous tracer injection at both inlets. The spatial distributions of LMAs and steady concentrations are obtained by tracer injections from each supply inlet, which demonstrate the supply characteristics of the individual inlets in the space. We have found that the overall LMA is the weighted average of the LMA by each inlet, and the weighting factor for the average is the corresponding steady state concentration at a given point. Experiments repeated for various airflow rates show that the nondimensional steady concentrations remain nearly constant regardless of the total airflow rate, but are greatly influenced by the airflow ratio between inlets. The local mean ages are found to increase proportionally with respect to the nominal time constant. Experimental procedures and results are verified by the fact that the total LMA measured at the exhaust is in good agreement with the theoretical nominal time constant of the space. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据