4.6 Article

Policy and regulatory framework for renewable energy and energy efficiency development in Ghana

期刊

CLIMATE POLICY
卷 9, 期 5, 页码 508-516

出版社

JAMES & JAMES SCIENCE PUBLISHERS LTD/EARTHSCAN
DOI: 10.3763/cpol.2009.0636

关键词

capacity building; climate policy; domestic policies; energy efficiency; energy sector; international support; regulatory framework; renewable energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

What external support is needed to assist Ghana's domestic policies to overcome domestic barriers and increase the scope, scale and speed of adoption of renewable energy and energy efficiency technologies? Although Ghana has a well-established regulatory environment and institutional set-up, international cooperation and support are required to leverage domestic policy and create an enabling environment to accelerate the transition to affordable and reliable renewable energy. International support can also be used to enhance the activities of the Energy Foundation and energy service companies (ESCOs) as well as to increase the adoption of energy efficiency technologies through residential and industrial demand-side management (DSM) activities. Policy relevance: Despite domestic and international financial incentives, barriers from the regulatory framework and from conventional practice prevent the utilization of renewable resources in both grid-connected and off-grid applications. Tackling these barriers requires both government commitment towards a comprehensive strategy and support from different stakeholders to explore viable solutions. Such action can be supported, but not replaced, with international support for capacity building, technical assistance and finance. Experience from Ghana points to some success for such a strategy for energy efficiency measures but also highlights the importance of domestic and international structures that ensure continuity of an institution with sufficient resources for programme and project execution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据