4.4 Article

Stem cell therapy for heart diseases

期刊

BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 143-159

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldr014

关键词

adult stem cell therapy; acute myocardial infarction; bone marrow stem; progenitor cells; dilated cardiomyopathy; heart failure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the advances in medical and catheter-based therapy for acute myocardial infarction the 1-year mortality remains as high as 13% and the 5-year prognosis for patients with heart failure remains as high as 50%. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction, a major determinant of prognosis, is associated with significant loss of cardiomyocytes which was previously thought to be irreversible as the heart was considered a post-mitotic organ. Sources of data: Review of literature published in peer reviewed journals and ClinicalTrials.Gov website. Areas of agreement: There is now growing evidence that the human heart is capable of undergoing repair and in recent years there has been an increase in basic and clinical research with the aim of harnessing the regenerative properties of stem cells in order to facilitate restoration of myocardial function. Areas of controversy: The mechanisms of action of cell therapy with regards to cardiac repair remain unsatisfactorily understood and the magnitude of benefit demonstrated in animal models is yet to be fully translated in humans. Growing points: The number of clinical trials continues to increase and include treating patients with acute myocardial infarction and chronic heart failure secondary to ischaemic heart disease or dilated cardiomyopathy. Areas timely for developing research: The future of this field of research will require closer collaboration between scientists and clinicians to understand how cell therapy works and to define the ideal cell type and method of delivery to be able to derive maximum benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据