4.5 Article

Surgical learning curve in performing palatoplasty: A retrospective study in 200 patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 1868-1874

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.08.021

关键词

Cleft fistula; Cleft palate closure; Learning curve; UCLP; Vomer flap

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the influence of the experience of the surgeon on the occurrence of fistulas following palatoplasty. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed of consecutive children treated between 2006 and 2013 for cleft palate by a single surgeon. Cleft palate repair was performed using the von Langenbeck technique, Furlow palatoplasty, buccal flap or Vomer flap. Data was collected for age, sex, date of birth, syndrome, adoption, cleft palate type, type of repair, cleft width, fistula occurrence and location of fistula. Results: A total of 276 operations were performed in 200 children (Veau I, II, III, IV). Mean age at surgery was 21.9 months (range: 6.2 months to 26 years 8.3 months). Postoperatively, palatal fistulas occurred in eight patients (4.0%), however, the incidence was 3.0% in the non-adoption group and 9.7% in the adoption population. In this study there was no statistically significant evidence of a surgical learning curve, and no significant associations between fistula rate and sex, adoption, syndrome, cleft type, cleft width, or type of repair. Conclusion and clinical relevance: This study demonstrates a fistula formation rate of 3.0% for the non-adoption population and 9.7% for the adoption population. There was no statistically significant evidence of a learning curve during the first few years of performing cleft palate repair. No other independent risk factors for postoperative fistula formation were identified; however, the benefit of a vomer flap and subsequent reduction in fistula incidence was demonstrated. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据