4.6 Article

p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling regulates vascular inflammation and epithelial barrier dysfunction in an experimental model of radiation-induced colitis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 226-234

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6811

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council [2003-4661, 2006-4889]
  2. Dir. A. Pahlsson's Foundation
  3. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  4. Malmo University Hospital Cancer Foundation
  5. Lundgren's Foundation
  6. Gunnar Nilsson's Foundation
  7. Apotekaren Hedberg's Fond
  8. Malmo University Hospital
  9. Lund University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Microvascular injury and epithelial barrier dysfunction are rate-limiting aspects in radiation enteropathy. This study examined the role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) signalling in radiation-induced colitis in an experimental model. Methods: The p38 MAPK inhibitor SB239063 was administered to mice immediately before exposure to 20 Gy radiation. Leucocyte- and platelet-endothelium interactions in the colonic microcirculation were assessed by intravital microscopy. Levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and CXC chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP) 2 and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant (KC)), and albumin leakage were quantified 16 It after irradiation. Results: Irradiation induced an increase in leucocyte and platelet recruitment, MPO activity, CXC chemokine levels and intestinal leakage. Inhibition of p38 MAPK by SB239063 decreased radiation-induced leucocyte and platelet recruitment (leucocyte rolling and adhesion by 70 and 90 per cent, both P < 0.001; that of platelets by 70 and 74 per cent, both P < 0.001). It also reduced radiation-provoked increases in colonic MPO activity by 88 per cent (P < 0.001), formation of MIP-2 and KC by 72 and 74 per cent respectively (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001), and intestinal leakage by 81 per cent (P < 0.001). Conclusion: p38 MAPK is an important signalling pathway in radiation-induced colitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据