3.8 Article

Evaluating the Swedish version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 81-87

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14038190802318986

关键词

Elderly; falls; fear of falling; fractures; health related quality of life; reliability; questionnaires

资金

  1. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare
  2. Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions and Region Skane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A number of instruments measuring psychological outcomes of falling exist, e.g. the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). An extended version of the FES, the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), has been developed and translated into several European languages. The aims of this study were to evaluate internal reliability, examine the internal structure of the FES-I(S) (the Swedish version of the FES-I), and to examine the correlation between fear of falling and health-related quality of life measured with Short Form 12 (SF-12). Eighty-six participants, aged 50-85 years (88% women), recruited from the Orthopaedic Department, Lund University Hospital, and treated for a fall-related fracture, answered the FES-I(S), SF-12 and a questionnaire of background factors. The FES-I(S) showed a high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95) and an inter-item correlation averaging 0.55. Factor analyses discriminated two factors dominated by items of less and more demanding physical activities, respectively. All items loaded strongly on a unitary underlying dimension There were significant correlations (p = 0.01) between the FES-I(S) and SF-12 physical component score and the FES-I(S) and SF-12 mental component score with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of -0.591 and -0.402, respectively. The FES-I(S) will be useful to assess fear of falling in Sweden in rehabilitation research and in clinical trials. Further studies are suggested to verify FES-I(S) validity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据