4.2 Article

Physicians' and Women's Views on Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk After the WHI: A Qualitative Study

期刊

WOMEN & HEALTH
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 280-293

出版社

HAWORTH PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03630240903158446

关键词

breast cancer; hormone therapy; qualitative

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG022578, R01-AG022578] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R01AG022578] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The use of menopausal hormone therapy (HT) has significantly declined since the release of the Women's Health Initiative findings, but to what extent physicians' and women's concerns about breast cancer contributed to this change is unknown. Our study explored physicians' and women's beliefs about hormone therapy and breast cancer risk. Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 22 primary care physicians and 45 female patients at two large integrated health care delivery systems in Washington State and Massachusetts. Results: Concerns about breast cancer risk weighed into the decision-making process for physicians and women in initiating and continuing hormone therapy. For women, control of menopausal symptoms was important and possibly outweighed their concerns about the potential risks of breast cancer. Though concerned about its association with increasing breast cancer risk, physicians were willing to consider hormone therapy to manage women's menopausal symptoms but were frustrated about the lack of available non-hormone therapy alternatives. Most physicians and some women were aware of the Women's Health Initiative, and its findings appeared to influence their beliefs about hormone therapy and breast cancer risk, though doubts remained among both groups about the study findings and implications. Conclusions: Our qualitative study suggests that after the Women's Health Initiative, concerns about breast cancer risk weighed into decisions to initiate and continue hormone therapy for both physicians and women, but menopausal symptoms often directed use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据