3.8 Article

Mind-Body Therapies and Osteoarthritis of the Knee

期刊

CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 204-211

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/157339709790192512

关键词

Osteoarthritis; knee; yoga; tai chi; qigong; mind-body

资金

  1. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [K01AT004108, 1R21 AT002982]
  2. Office of Research on Women's Health (ORWH)
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [K01AT004108] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R21AT002982] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osteoarthritis of the knee is a major cause of disability among adults worldwide. Important treatment options include nonpharmacologic therapies, and especially symptom management strategies in which patients take an active role. Among these, mind-body therapies may have particular promise for alleviating the distressful symptoms associated with osteoarthritis of the knee. However, systematic reviews are lacking. The objective of this paper is to review English-language articles describing clinical studies evaluating the effects of patient-driven mind-body therapies on symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Eight studies, representing a total of 267 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Interventions included tai chi, qigong, and yoga. Collectively, these studies suggest that specific mind-body practices may help alleviate pain and enhance physical function in adults suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee. However, sample sizes are small, rigorous investigations are few, and the potential benefits of several mind-body therapies have not yet been systematically tested. Additional high-quality studies are needed to clarify the effects of specific mind-body therapies on standardized measures of pain, physical function, and related indices in persons with osteoarthritis of the knee, and to investigate possible underlying mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据