4.6 Article

A novel submaximal cycle test to monitor fatigue and predict cycling performance

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 797-804

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.061325

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  2. Discovery Health
  3. University of Cape Town/MRC Research Unit for Exercise Science and Sports Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the reliability and predictive value of performance parameters, measured by a new novel submaximal cycle protocol, on peak power and endurance cycling performance in well-trained cyclists. Methods Seventeen well-trained competitive male road racing cyclists completed four peak power output (PPO) tests and four 40-km time trials (40-km TT). Before each test, all cyclists performed a novel submaximal cycle test (Lamberts and Lambert Submaximal Cycle Test (LSCT)). Parameters associated with performance such as power, speed, cadence and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were measured during the three stages of the test when cyclists rode at workloads coinciding with fixed predetermined heart rates. Heart rate recovery (HRR) was measured after the last stage of the test. Results Parameters measured during the second and third stages of the LSCT were highly reliable (intraclass correlation range: R=0.85-1.00) with low typical error of measurements (range: 1.3-4.4%). Good relationships were found between the LSCT and cycling performance measured by the PPO and 40-km TT tests. Mean power had stronger relationships with measures of cycling performance during the second (r=0.80-0.89) and third stages (r=0.91-0.94) of the LSCT than HRR (r=0.55-0.68). Conclusions The LSCT is a reliable novel test which is able to predict peak and endurance cycling performance from submaximal power, RPE and HRR in well-trained cyclists. As these parameters are able to detect meaningful changes more accurately than VO2max, the LSCT has the potential to monitor cycling performance with more precision than other current existing submaximal cycle protocols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据