4.6 Article

A Micromegas-based low-background x-ray detector coupled to a slumped-glass telescope for axion research

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/12/008

关键词

axions; dark matter detectors; dark matter experiments; X-ray telescopes

资金

  1. European Commission under the European Research Council T-REX Starting Grant [ERC-2009-StG-240054]
  2. Spanish Ministry MINECO [FPA2008-03456, FPA2011-24058]
  3. CPAN project from the Consolider-Ingenio program [C5D2007-00042]
  4. European Regional Development funded (ERDF/FEDER)
  5. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  6. Juan de la Cierya program
  7. Ramon y Cajal program of MICINN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the design, construction and operation of a low background x-ray detection line composed of a shielded Micromegas detector of the microbulk technology. The detector is made from radiopure materials and is placed at the focal point of a similar to 5 cm diameter, 1.5 m focal-length, cone-approximation Wolter I x-ray telescope (XRT) assembled from thermally-formed (or slumped) glass substrates deposited with multilayer coatings. The system has been conceived as a technological pathfinder for the future International Axion Observatory (IAXO), as it combines two of the techniques (optic and detector) proposed in the conceptual design of the project. It is innovative for two reasons: it is the first time an x-ray optic has been designed and fabricated specifically for axion research, and the first time a Micromegas detector has been operated with an x-ray optic. The line has been installed at one end of the CERN Axion Solar Telescope (CAST) magnet and is currently looking for solar axions. The combination of the XRT and Micromegas detector provides the best signal-to-noise ratio obtained so far by any detection system of the CAST experiment with a background rate of 5.4 x 10(-3) counts per hour in the energy region-of-interest and signal spot area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据