4.4 Article

Is there an association between intestinal perfusion and Crohn's disease activity? A feasibility study using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 82, 期 974, 页码 112-117

出版社

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/43430629

关键词

-

资金

  1. ESAOTE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent study used contrast-enhanced ultrasound to assess splanchnic haemodynamics. This study investigates whether an association exists between disease activity and splanchnic transit time in patients with suspected Crohn's disease. The study protocol had the approval of the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained. 18 patients (11 women; mean age, 40 years; age range, 2369 years) with suspected or confirmed Crohn's disease were recruited prospectively. A bolus injection of an ultrasound contrast agent was given via a peripheral vein and time-intensity curves of the superior mesenteric artery and vein were analysed. Splanchnic transit time was calculated as the time interval between the rise in signal intensity to >10% above baseline value. Baseline parameters measured included the time-averaged maximum velocity and cross-sectional area of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA). Pearson correlations were used to test associations between different numeric measurements; the independent samples t-test was used to test associations between different numeric measurements; and the independent samples t-test was used to compare mean values between patients with active and inactive disease. There was a weak negative association between splanchnic transit time and the Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (r=-0.42), which did not reach statistical significance (p=0.13), although the mean splanchnic transit time was reduced in the active group (4.0 s vs 6.9 s). The SMA flow rate was significantly greater in active disease (37 ml s(-1) vs 22 ml s(-1); Mann-Whitney U, p=0.02). This study demonstrates the feasibility of using contrast-enhanced ultrasound as an assessment tool for Crohn's disease. (C) 2009 The British Institute of Radiology

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据