4.6 Article

Treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic v. standard out-patient treatment in the early course of bipolar disorder: randomised clinical trial

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
卷 202, 期 3, 页码 212-219

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.113548

关键词

-

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Research Foundation of the Hovedstadens Sygehusfaellesskab (The Capital Hospital Corporation)
  3. Lundbeck Foundation [R44-2009-4195] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Little is known about whether treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic improves long-term prognosis for patients discharged from initial psychiatric hospital admissions for bipolar disorder. Aims To assess the effect of treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic v. standard decentralised psychiatric treatment among patients discharged from one of their first three psychiatric hospital admissions for bipolar disorder. Method Patients discharged from their first, second or third hospital admission with a single manic episode or bipolar disorder were randomised to treatment in a specialised out-patient mood disorder clinic or standard care (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00253071). The primary outcome measure was readmission to hospital, which was obtained from the Danish Psychiatric Central Register. Results A total of 158 patients with mania/bipolar disorder were included. The rate of readmission to hospital was significantly decreased for patients treated in the mood disorder clinic compared with standard treatment (unadjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.97, P=0.034). Patients treated in the mood disorder clinic more often used a mood stabiliser or an antipsychotic and satisfaction with treatment was more prevalent than among patients who received standard care. Conclusions Treatment in a specialised mood disorder clinic early in-the course of bipolar disorder substantially reduces readmission to a psychiatric hospital and increases satisfaction with care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据