4.7 Article

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and in vivo [I]/Ki accurately predict P-glycoprotein-mediated drug-drug interactions with dabigatran etexilate

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 171, 期 4, 页码 1043-1053

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/bph.12533

关键词

in vivo' K-i; physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling; dabigatran etexilate; P-glycoprotein; digoxin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purposeIn vitro inhibitory potency (K-i)-based predictions of P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are hampered by the substantial variability in inhibitory potency. In this study, in vivo-based [I]/K-i values were used to predict the DDI risks of a P-gp substrate dabigatran etexilate (DABE) using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelling. Experimental approachA baseline PBPK model was established with digoxin, a known P-gp substrate. The K-m (P-gp transport) of digoxin in the baseline PBPK model was adjusted to K-m(i) to fit the change of digoxin pharmacokinetics in the presence of a P-gp inhibitor. Then in vivo' [I]/K-i of this P-gp inhibitor was calculated using K-m(i)/K-m. Baseline PBPK model was developed for DABE, and the in vivo' [I]/K-i was incorporated into this model to simulate the static effect of P-gp inhibitor on DABE pharmacokinetics. This approach was verified by comparing the observed and the simulated DABE pharmacokinetics in the presence of five different P-gp inhibitors. Key resultsThis approach accurately predicted the effects of five P-gp inhibitors on DABE pharmacokinetics (98-133% and 89-104% for the ratios of AUC and C-max respectively). The effects of 16 other P-gp inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of DABE were also confidently simulated. Conclusions and implicationsIn vivo' [I]/K-i and PBPK modelling, used in combination, can accurately predict P-gp-mediated DDIs. The described framework provides a mechanistic basis for the proper design of clinical DDI studies, as well as avoiding unnecessary clinical DDI studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据