4.7 Review

Tau-targeted treatment strategies in Alzheimer's disease

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 165, 期 5, 页码 1246-1259

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01713.x

关键词

neuropharmacology; neuroprotective drugs; therapeutic antibodies; learning and memory; synaptic plasicity

资金

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  3. J.O. & J.R. Wicking Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With populations ageing worldwide, the need for treating and preventing diseases associated with high age is pertinent. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is reaching epidemic proportions, yet the currently available therapies are limited to a symptomatic relief, without halting the degenerative process that characterizes the AD brain. As in AD cholinergic neurons are lost at high numbers, the initial strategies were limited to the development of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, and more recently the NMDA receptor antagonist memantine, in counteracting excitotoxicity. With the identification of the protein tau in intracellular neurofibrillary tangles and of the peptide amyloid-beta (A beta) in extracellular amyloid plaques in the AD brain, and a better understanding of their role in disease, newer strategies are emerging, which aim at either preventing their formation and deposition or at accelerating their clearance. Interestingly, what is well established to combat viral diseases in peripheral organs vaccination seems to work for the brain as well. Accordingly, immunization strategies targeting A beta show efficacy in mice and to some degree also in humans. Even more surprising is the finding in mice that immunization strategies targeting tau, a protein that forms aggregates in nerve cells, ameliorates the tau-associated pathology. We are reviewing the literature and discuss what can be expected regarding the translation into clinical practice and how the findings can be extended to other neurodegenerative diseases with protein aggregation in brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据