4.7 Article

Molecular basis of selective antagonism of the P2X1 receptor for ATP by NF449 and suramin: contribution of basic amino acids in the cysteine-rich loop

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 165, 期 2, 页码 390-400

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01534.x

关键词

P2X; ATP; suramin; NF449; oocytes; ion channel; antagonist; mutagenesis

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation
  2. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The cysteine-rich head region, which is adjacent to the proposed ATP-binding pocket in the extracellular ligand-binding loop of P2X receptors for ATP, is absent in the antagonist-insensitive Dictyostelium receptors. In this study we have determined the contribution of the head region to the antagonist action of NF449 and suramin at the human P2X1 receptor. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Chimeras and point mutations in the cysteine-rich head region were made between human P2X1 and P2X2 receptors. Mutant receptors were expressed in Xenopus oocytes and P2X receptor currents characterized using two-electrode voltage clamp. KEY RESULTS The chimera replacing the region between the third and fourth conserved cysteine residues of the P2X1 receptor with the corresponding part of P2X2 reduced N1449 sensitivity a thousand fold from an IC50 of similar to 1 nM at the P2X1 receptor to that of the P2X2 receptor (IC50 similar to 1 mu M). A similar decrease in sensitivity resulted from mutation of four positively charged P2X1 receptor residues in this region that are absent from the P2X2 receptor. These chimeras and mutations were also involved in determining sensitivity to the antagonist suramin. Reciprocal chimeras and mutations in the P2X2 receptor produced modest increases in antagonist sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These data indicate that a cluster of positively charged residues at the base of the cysteine-rich head region can account for the highly selective antagonism of the P2X1 receptor by the suramin derivative NF449.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据