4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Intermedin (adrenomedullin-2): a novel counter-regulatory peptide in the cardiovascular and renal systems

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 S247-S262

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707494

关键词

ischaemia; hypertrophy; cardiomyocyte; myocardium; kidney; intermedin; adrenomedullin; CGRP; RAMP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intermedin (IMD) is a novel peptide related to calcitonin gene-related peptide ( CGRP) and adrenomedullin ( AM). Proteolytic processing of a larger precursor yields a series of biologically active C-terminal fragments, IMD1-53, IMD1-47 and IMD8-47. IMD shares a family of receptors with AM and CGRP composed of a calcitonin-receptor like receptor (CALCRL) associated with one of three receptor activity modifying proteins ( RAMP). Compared to CGRP, IMD is less potent at CGRP(1) receptors but more potent at AM(1) receptors and AM(2) receptors; compared to AM, IMD is more potent at CGRP1 receptors but less potent at AM(1) and AM(2) receptors. The cellular and tissue distribution of IMD overlaps in some aspects with that of CGRP and AM but is distinct from both. IMD is present in neonatal but absent or expressed sparsely, in adult heart and vasculature and present at low levels in plasma. The prominent localization of IMD in hypothalamus and pituitary and in kidney is consistent with a physiological role in the central and peripheral regulation of the circulation and water-electrolyte homeostasis. IMD is a potent systemic and pulmonary vasodilator, influences regional blood flow and augments cardiac contractility. IMD protects myocardium from the deleterious effects of oxidative stress associated with ischaemia-reperfusion injury and exerts an anti-growth effect directly on cardiomyocytes to oppose the influence of hypertrophic stimuli. The robust increase in expression of the peptide in hypertrophied and ischaemic myocardium indicates an important protective role for IMD as an endogenous counter-regulatory peptide in the heart.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据