4.7 Article

Proof-of-concept study on the suitability of C-13-urea as a marker substance for assessment of in vivo behaviour of oral colon-targeted dosage forms

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 158, 期 2, 页码 532-540

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00302.x

关键词

colon delivery; colon-targeting; stable isotope; C-13-urea; fermentation; intestinal metabolism; bioavailability; urea; OCTT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: C-13-urea may be a suitable marker to assess the in vivo fate of colon-targeted dosage forms given by mouth. We postulated that release in the colon (urease-rich segment) of C-13-urea from colon-targeted capsules would lead to fermentation of C-13-urea by bacterial ureases into (CO2)-C-13. Subsequent absorption into the blood and circulation would lead to detectable C-13 (as (CO2)-C-13) in breath. If, however, release of C-13-urea occurred in the small intestine (urease-poor segment), we expected detectable C-13 (as C-13-urea) in blood but no breath C-13 (as (CO2)-C-13). The differential kinetics of C-13-urea could thus potentially describe both release kinetics and indicate the gastrointestinal segment of release. Experimental approach: The in vivo study consisted of three experiments, during which the same group of four volunteers participated. Key results: The kinetic model was internally valid. The appearance of C-13-in breath CO2 (F-fermented) and the appearance of C-13 in blood as C-13-urea (F-not fermented) show a high inverse correlation (Pearson's r = -0.981, P = 0.06). The total recovery of C-13 (F-fermented + F-not fermented) averaged 99%, indicating complete recovery of the administered C-13 via breath and blood. (CO2)-C-13 exhalation was observed in all subjects. This indicates that C-13-urea was available in urease-rich segments, such as the caecum or colon. Conclusions and implications: In this proof-of-concept study, C-13-urea was able to provide information on both the release kinetics of a colon-targeted oral dosage form and the gastrointestinal segment where it was released.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据